PDA

View Full Version : Lou Dobbs challenges his own CNN network


Cumulo-nimbus
Aug 3rd 2009, 05:56 AM
Look, I don't even like the man except for his stance on illegal immigration (the two words CAN be mutually exclusive, there have been ways to come here legally since day one, a fact the media often forgets) but was this article written by Michael Moore? It seems that if anyone falls out of line with the far-left mindset these days, they're ready to take you out and hang you up by your toenails.

Lou Dobbs Tonight is still one of the most watched programs on CNN, so he's obviously expressing opinions held by a significant number of people. I don't watch it. In fact, the few times I have watched it I feel as though he is just a master manipulator, pandering to his audience. CNN's left-slanted reporting does that also, just from a different side of the aisle. It infuriates me that there are interests who want to shut their critics up so bad they'll release garbage like this article from the "government-controlled" AP. To me, its better to get a line of crap from two sides rather than just one so at least I have two different ones to start my research into a matter on.

What I'm saying is: a free and open discourse should be priority one in this country, and people should be allowed to speak their mind on political issues without fear of recourse. The douche writing this article clearly wants to see some blood just because he doesn't agree with Lou.

Since when was CNN's brand "no bias"? I can't even stomach most of the crap they spew out each day, they're just as bad as Fox News for being biased.

News is not really my forte, but I do have to be subjected to it at work several hours a day, and have developed my opinions accordingly.

Anyway, here's that article... Now that I've decompressed a little, I'll go away. That is all. (Oh, and by the way, I'm getting married to someone from another country who took the time to come here legally so I feel I am allowed to have an opinion on the immigration issue.)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090803/ap_on_en_tv/us_tv_lou_dobbs

NEW YORK – He's become a publicity nightmare for CNN, embarrassed his boss and hosted a show that seemed to contradict the network's "no bias" brand. And on top of all that, his ratings are slipping.

How does Lou Dobbs keep his job?

It's not a simple answer. CNN insists it is standing behind Dobbs, despite calls for his head from critics of his reporting on "birthers" — those who believe President Barack Obama wasn't born in the United States despite convincing evidence to the contrary. The "birthers" believe Obama was born in Kenya, and thus not eligible to be president.

Dobbs' work has been so unpopular that even Ann Coulter has criticized him.

Dobbs has acknowledged that he believes Obama was born in Hawaii. But he gives airtime to disbelievers, and has said the president should try to put questions fully to rest by releasing a long version of his birth certificate. He's twice done stories on his show after the public leak of a memo from CNN U.S. President Jon Klein saying that "it seems this story is dead."
Klein said those stories were OK because they were about the controversy and weren't actually questioning the facts. But critics suggest Klein is parsing words, that even raising the issue lends it credence.

Joked The Washington Post's Lisa de Moraes: it "explains their upcoming documentary: `The World: Flat. We Report — You Decide.'"

Dobbs hasn't made it any easier by using his radio show to fight back at critics, who he called "limp-minded, lily-livered lefty lemmings." He considered going on CNN tormentor Bill O'Reilly's Fox News show to thank him (O'Reilly says the birthers are wrong, but he defended Dobbs' right to talk about it).

"He's embarrassed himself and he's embarrassed CNN," said Brooks Jackson, a former CNN correspondent. "And that's not a good thing for any network that wants to be seen as a reputable, nonpartisan news organization."
So who needs the headache?

Klein said Dobbs does a smart newscast that explores issues that get little in-depth attention elsewhere, such as trade with China, health care funding and the stimulus plan. He suggested Dobbs' CNN work is unfairly lumped in with his unrelated radio show, and that he's judged on the show he did a couple of years ago, when Dobbs became a political target for his campaigning against illegal immigration.

The two men sat down after last year's election to make changes, aware that the anti-immigrant Dobbs' image ran counter to the brand CNN was trying to create. CNN calls itself the network of unbiased reporting compared to conservative commentators on Fox and liberal ones at MSNBC.

Since then, Dobbs has been doing a relatively straight newscast, Klein said.

"He brings more than three decades of experience reporting and broadcasting the news," Klein said, "and that's very valuable to a news network."

Through a spokeswoman, Dobbs said he would not comment for this story. But he is a CNN original. Except for a two-year break a decade ago, he's been with CNN virtually from the network's beginning. Much of that time was spent anchoring a business newscast that made him hugely influential in the business community and immensely valuable to CNN. Old-timers say the desire of advertisers to be connected with Dobbs and Larry King essentially funded the network for years.
Dobbs is considered among the smartest people at CNN, and also the most personally intimidating. For whatever reason — the rise of CNBC as a competitor or a sense that opinionated hosts were the future for cable news — Dobbs morphed from a business anchor to a polarizing populist.

That version of Dobbs seemed better suited for HLN, formerly CNN Headline News, which has an opinionated prime-time lineup led by Nancy Grace. But reruns of Dobbs' show didn't do well on HLN, which is more female oriented. Klein said he and Dobbs determined Dobbs was more valuable as a reporter than as a commentator.
The 861,000 people who tune into his 7 p.m. ET newscast on a typical night are down 20 percent from last year, according to Nielsen Media Research. He's still ahead of MSNBC's Chris Matthews in that hour.
"It's very cutthroat," said Janet Keefer, a Drake University journalism professor and former CNN producer. "As long as he isn't doing anything that's driving viewers away, they'll keep him."

Fear could be another factor keeping Dobbs and CNN together.

Dobbs has never been shy about fighting for his point of view. His feud with former CNN chief Rick Kaplan spilled out on the air in 1999 when he objected to having his "Moneyline" show pre-empted for a speech by President Clinton about the Columbine school shootings. "CNN President Rick Kaplan wants us to return to Littleton," he said. Dobbs soon left CNN and returned after Kaplan left.

With Dobbs hosting his own weekday radio show, the thought of him launching anti-CNN missiles every day has to be disconcerting.

It's also not hard to imagine Fox News chief Roger Ailes coveting Dobbs as a prize for his struggling business news network, offering reports to the main news channel as well.

Organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and Media Matters for America have called for CNN to take Dobbs off the air; he's proven a galvanizing and attention-getting force for his critics. At CNN, they're hoping the controversy dies down with the heat of August.

For that, they'll need Lou Dobbs' help.

wx or not
Aug 3rd 2009, 06:03 AM
Careful when you bite the hand that feeds you. There may be no more food left.

anti-spam
Aug 3rd 2009, 06:32 AM
Be careful....

We have received a stern, yet friendly, email from the author of an online article which was recently cut-and-pasted onto one of our forums.

The Reporter pointed out that posting an entire article without permission violates copyright and harms him financially since he is paid by the page view.

Effective immediately, cut-and-pastes of entire articles will not be allowed. If you wish to post the author's name and employer, the first couple of paragraphs and a link to the entire article, that is fine.

An example. (http://openline.medialine.com/showthread.php?t=32790)

In the future, cut-and-pastes of entire articles will be deleted -- even if a link is provided.

Thanks.

RPS

News Is Broken
Aug 3rd 2009, 07:26 AM
The Birthers would be a good name for a band.

s'news
Aug 3rd 2009, 07:47 AM
Something that caught my eye.

Dobbs' work has been so unpopular that even Ann Coulter has criticized him.

Sparky
Aug 3rd 2009, 10:14 AM
Something that caught my eye.

Dobbs' work has been so unpopular that even Ann Coulter has criticized him.


So does that mean that Lou Dobbs is just like the four New Jersey widows who were happy their husbands died in the World Trade Center on 9/11/01?

s'news
Aug 3rd 2009, 10:33 AM
Something else that caught my eye, outside of this thread. A poll by Research 2000 released a few days ago says 28 percent of Republicans agree with the birthers that Obama isn't legally the president. Another 30 percent of Republicans say they're not sure if Obama is legally in office.

wx or not
Aug 3rd 2009, 10:41 AM
Fantastic. A squatter. How does one evict a White House squatter?:eek:

sonorandesert
Aug 4th 2009, 12:23 AM
Something else that caught my eye, outside of this thread. A poll by Research 2000 released a few days ago says 28 percent of Republicans agree with the birthers that Obama isn't legally the president. Another 30 percent of Republicans say they're not sure if Obama is legally in office.
Gotta love statistics.
On the other hand, 72% of those surveyed agree with that notion that Borak is legally the president while 70% of Republicans agree he is a legal resident of the US.
Statistics are like play-doe.
Shape and color any way you wish.

The Mockingbird
Aug 4th 2009, 04:12 AM
The Birthers would be a good name for a band.

Lou Dobbs and the Birthers would be a good band name for 1956.

cinehead
Aug 4th 2009, 07:24 AM
Gotta love statistics.
On the other hand, 72% of those surveyed agree with that notion that Borak is legally the president while 70% of Republicans agree he is a legal resident of the US.
Statistics are like play-doe.
Shape and color any way you wish.

Um, no. Reread s'news' post. You need to add the two numbers together. The statistic you're trying for would read that 42 percent of Republicans agree that Barack Obama is the legal president of the U.S..

Roy Hobbs
Aug 12th 2009, 05:15 AM
Trooper Hannibal Dobbs?
http://www.bobbyworks.com/images/Dobbs%201.jpg

Nanook of the North
Aug 21st 2009, 02:54 PM
He'll get a slot in the afternoon on Fox. Isn't that where all the has-beens at CNN go?

The Thrill
Aug 21st 2009, 07:54 PM
Fantastic. A squatter. How does one evict a White House squatter?:eek:

Beam him up, Scotty? http://www.treehugger.com/white-house.jpg

Diplomat
Aug 29th 2009, 12:25 PM
Um, no. Reread s'news' post. You need to add the two numbers together. The statistic you're trying for would read that 42 percent of Republicans agree that Barack Obama is the legal president of the U.S..

Borak? Isn't he that obnoxious comedian who made a dopey movie? Or is that a brand of soap?