View Full Version : Veiled homophobia ... or not?
ShakAttack
Aug 7th 2008, 06:56 AM
Church wants "Gay Boulevard" name changed
San ANTONIO, Texas – What's in a name? A lot of your church sits on Gay Boulevard.
That’s the case for Second Baptist Church in San Antonio. Officials there want the name changed.
In order to do that, the church will pay a $500 application fee to the city to change the name and pay for about $800 worth of new street signs.
“First of all, Gay Street, that’s not a proper name because I’m, anti-gay,” said someone with the church.
“We get opposition, it’s the people that have an address on the street who have to change stationery or information they have. But there are no residents with the address of gay street right now, so that’s not an issue,” said Roderick Sanchez who is the Director of Development Services.
Church officials say this is not all about sexual preference.
They say that their facility has been in the neighborhood for 120 years and plans to open a community center down the road. A city park nearby already bears the church’s name. They want the street changed to Second Baptist Way.
The San Antonio City Council will vote on the name change proposal Thursday.
Courtesy: http://www.khou.com/news/state/stories/khou080806_jj_gay_way_church_san_antonio.1e23aecd. html#
Kace
Aug 7th 2008, 06:59 AM
Maybe they can change it to Lesbian Street.
Mr. Rugen
Aug 7th 2008, 07:02 AM
I don't like corn, so I suffer from cornophobia.
I don't like Debra from Everybody Loves Raymond so I'm Debraphobic.
I don't agree with those that say the economy is doing well, so I'm econophobic.
tater
Aug 7th 2008, 07:03 AM
I don't like phobias...so I'm phobaphob.
Angel's Hell
Aug 7th 2008, 07:21 AM
I don't like phobias...so I'm phobaphob.
It's called the religious right, and they are often WRONG!!!!
s'news
Aug 7th 2008, 07:28 AM
It is, you know, kind of gay.
Kace
Aug 7th 2008, 09:03 AM
Being gay is the same as being a fictional character or a vegetable. :rockon:
FD2BLK
Aug 7th 2008, 09:27 AM
Happy Street?
Mr. Rugen
Aug 7th 2008, 09:30 AM
Not liking something is the same as being afraid of it. :thumbsup:
Diplomat
Aug 7th 2008, 09:31 AM
This is as asinine as the story I saw the other night about a small but vocal group of gay people upset about a Snickers commercial that aired in the UK.
I've seen many churches named after streets - "15th St. Baptist Church" or "Parkway Church of Christ." It's usually not the other way around, although there is a "Baptist World Center Drive" in Nashville. I think the BWC is the only thing on that street, though.
The church leaders pushing this are just dopey.
Kace
Aug 7th 2008, 09:33 AM
Not liking something is the same as being afraid of it.
Maybe, maybe not, but in that particular instance it's definetly bigotry.
Kace
Aug 7th 2008, 09:34 AM
Yeah, but...nobody was talking about gay people and Snickers.. :-/
Mr. Rugen
Aug 7th 2008, 09:35 AM
Wanting to control the way you are presented to the world is the same as bigotry.
Kace
Aug 7th 2008, 09:40 AM
Yeah, that whole respecting a human being thing's way overrated.
...Actually, it probably is.
Mr. Rugen
Aug 7th 2008, 09:42 AM
But it's not a human being, it's a street.
Diplomat
Aug 7th 2008, 09:46 AM
Yeah, but...nobody was talking about gay people and Snickers.. :-/
I'm just pointing out that sometimes people overreact to stuff. You understand that. A lot of posters on this board do not.
Kace
Aug 7th 2008, 09:49 AM
Yeah, but at the same time you could've just made your point by simply saying, "that's dopey and people shouldn't overreact like that."
Kace
Aug 7th 2008, 09:52 AM
But it's not a human being, it's a street.
Yes, a street that's trying to control how it's presented.
All I know is that this will backfire on the Desperate Dems.
Diplomat
Aug 7th 2008, 09:54 AM
Yeah, but at the same time you could've just made your point by simply saying, "that's dopey and people shouldn't overreact like that."
I used the comparison because it is valid and it is recent. A lot of gay people thought the Snickers ad was not offensive, just as a lot of people of faith don't get why a vocal few are upset over the street's name. The ones who made a stink, like the church leaders, are drawing a conclusion that simply is not there.
Spike
Aug 7th 2008, 10:24 AM
I used the comparison because it is valid and it is recent. A lot of gay people thought the Snickers ad was not offensive, just as a lot of people of faith don't get why a vocal few are upset over the street's name. The ones who made a stink, like the church leaders, are drawing a conclusion that simply is not there.
In other words: "Gay people do it too!"
Bandit
Aug 7th 2008, 10:42 AM
Wanting to control the way you are presented to the world is the same as bigotry. Good a reason as any why the church should back down then. ;)
Diplomat
Aug 7th 2008, 10:50 AM
In other words: "Gay people do it too!"
If that's what you are think, you are free to think that way. I didn't say that nor do I think it.
Spike
Aug 7th 2008, 11:33 AM
You're such a weasel.
This is as asinine as the story I saw the other night about a small but vocal group of gay people upset about a Snickers commercial that aired in the UK.
"Gay people do it too!"
Produce man
Aug 7th 2008, 11:58 AM
The only thing that's gay is this thread.
Bandit
Aug 7th 2008, 12:49 PM
Actually, I did find these stories about the "controversy."
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=85f_1217993738
http://pageoneq.com/news/2008/gaystreet080608.html
Nothing to see here really. I think the person interviewed speaks for himself - and clearly does reflect an anti-gay sentiment.
But does he speak for the whole congregation or for the leadership of the church? Who knows?
Mighty Dyckerson
Aug 7th 2008, 01:22 PM
The only thing that's gay is this thread.
Yep, now that you're in it.
Diplomat
Aug 7th 2008, 01:32 PM
You're such a weasel.
"Gay people do it too!"
Spike, you should stop taking those stupid pills. They're making you even more ignorant than you normally are. Enjoy hiding behind your screen name--I know you'd cower like a baby if we were having this discussion in person.
Diplomat
Aug 7th 2008, 01:33 PM
Actually, I did find these stories about the "controversy."
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=85f_1217993738
http://pageoneq.com/news/2008/gaystreet080608.html
Nothing to see here really. I think the person interviewed speaks for himself - and clearly does reflect an anti-gay sentiment.
But does he speak for the whole congregation or for the leadership of the church? Who knows?
Very good question.
JoinUsForCake
Aug 7th 2008, 04:07 PM
Veiled homophobia ... or not?
I'd say that's wide-open, cheese-to-the-wind, raging homophobia.
But that's just me.
TVMattNYC
Aug 7th 2008, 04:33 PM
This church shouldn't complain.
It could be worse:
http://www.popular-pics.com/thumbnails/great-street-names.jpg