PDA

View Full Version : $125,000 to call an NFL game...poorly?


SpxGrunt
Apr 21st 2008, 07:59 AM
According to Phil Mushnick in the Post:
There are NFL execs who still cannot believe that Bryant Gumbel was hired to be the play-by-play voice of the start-up NFL Network to begin with.

Not only did Gumbel, who recently resigned, have no football play-by-play experience it showed we're told that NFLN was paying him roughly $1 million a year to call eight games. That's roughly $125,000 a game. That's roughly crazy.

On the other hand, if you consider he had no experience, he wasn't as bad as he was expensive.

Fifty years later, TV people still think sports fans tune to games to hear announcers. Announcers can enhance the telecast or they can drive viewers to distraction, but they can't make anyone, outside of their immediate families, watch.

adam & doctor drew
Apr 21st 2008, 10:07 AM
good for him, or anyone who can get that good a deal.

I didn't think he was that bad.
but even if you thought he was awful, all he did was accept a lucrative deal that was offered to him (as would anyone else).

he didn't put a gun to anyone's head.

Kace
Apr 21st 2008, 03:50 PM
Phil didn't like him...which kinda prompts me to think that maybe Bryant wasn't all that bad, after all.

SpxGrunt
Apr 24th 2008, 06:59 PM
Gumbel was bad. No, he wasn't bad, he was horrible. I've heard local yokels in small markets call a better football game. I'd rather hear Tiny Tim sing opera than hear Gumbel call another game. Good journalist, terrible PXP.