View Full Version : KOLD anchor says he was fired for e-mail
Paper Trail
Oct 6th 2006, 09:24 AM
By Erin White
Arizona Daily Star (http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/149844)
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 10.06.2006
KOLD-TV Channel 13 evening news anchor Randy Garsee says he was fired Tuesday afternoon.
His termination followed an e-mail he sent out to station staff members Monday evening, Garsee said.
In the e-mail, which was obtained by the Star, Garsee criticizes News Director Michelle Germano for micromanaging. The former anchor described the e-mail as a "scream in the dark."
Germano said she couldn't confirm that Garsee's contract had been terminated because it was a personnel matter, but she did say he no longer works for KOLD.
Garsee said General Manager Jim Arnold approached him Tuesday about 4:15 p.m. as he was applying his makeup.
"He said sending out the e-mail was insubordination. He handed me a box and said, 'Clean out your desk and don't talk to anybody,' " Garsee said.
Garsee's departure makes the second anchor change at KOLD in recent months; longtime employee Kris Pickel left at the end of May to take a job closer to her family in Sacramento, Calif.
Garsee said the e-mail wasn't the first clash he had with management. He said that for the first eight of his 10 years at KOLD, he had the freedom to pursue whatever story he chose. In recent years, he said, that freedom evaporated and he had less time for reporting.
Germano said she wouldn't comment on any specific criticisms of her management style but did say "there are policies and protocols in place for stories to get on the air. That's just a procedural thing." She also said she did her best to create a positive working environment at KOLD.
"In any work situation there's conflict, but I strive to work that and move forward," Germano said.
Garsee also said he'd been reprimanded for his trademark, smart-alecky comments made on-air.
Garsee said he wasn't completely caught off guard Tuesday.
"I felt like it was going to happen sooner or later," he said. Still, he said the timing surprised him.
"I've had people call me and tell me they're stunned. How can you take the No. 1 news anchor and fire him after his co-anchor left right before another book comes up," Garsee said, referring to the November ratings period. In recent years, KOLD has ended KVOA-TV Channel 4's long dominance in the ratings, rising to challenge it for the top spot for local news.
Arnold said he wasn't concerned about changing anchors so close to sweeps, which start next month. Both he and Germano stressed that KOLD's content would not change.
Garsee, who has daughters ages 11 and 5, said he's already talked with Channels 4 and 9 because he'd like to stay in Tucson.
"I gave up a lot of money and put my family's future in jeopardy to send the message that KOLD was going in the wrong direction," he said. "I just want the viewers to know how much I love this town," he said.
Dan Marries will fill in until KOLD hires a replacement, Germano said.
The news director also said a new female anchor would start next week but wouldn't identify her or say exactly when she would start.
Garsee said he will continue to work on a project he's been calling "Randy Garsee's Tucson Murals Project," (tucson murals.blogspot.com) which profiles murals across town.
● Contact reporter Erin White at 807-8429 or ewhite@azstarnet.com .
[ October 06, 2006, 09:42 AM: Message edited by: Paper Trail ]
The Mockingbird
Oct 6th 2006, 09:29 AM
Wow, I'd love to see that e-mail. smile.gif
Paper Trail
Oct 6th 2006, 09:34 AM
PUBLISHED ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2006:
Media Watch (http://www.tucsonweekly.com/gbase/Currents/Content?oid=oid:86962)
KOLD's Smart-Ass Anchor Awaits His New Partner
By JOHN SCHUSTER
He's flip. He's straightforward. He's something of a smart ass. He once jokingly called a weatherman a jackass on the air and made light of another "local" news anchor who actually broadcasts from another market.
He's not always on the Christmas-card list of his production staff. If something goes wrong on the air, he'll openly reference it.
For nearly a decade, Randy Garsee has called it as he sees it as the anchor on KOLD Channel 13's now top-rated 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. newscasts. Hired in March 1997, a month after KOLD acquired Kris Pickel, Garsee was part of the CBS affiliate's desire to pull itself out of ratings doldrums. It took some time, but eventually the move paid off, and KOLD has been the local news top dog for a few years.
KOLD's approach was to go younger, but Garsee's appeal spreads far beyond a youth-movement trend. An off-the-cuff personality is what separates him from other newsreaders.
"We're in an industry where reporters are expected to write a certain way and get the information out, and anchors are expected to do the same. I kind of run against that grain sometimes," Garsee said. "Everybody I sought advice from said: 'Be the straight and narrow. Do the news; have the chitchat with the weather guy. Go on.' It never set well with me.
"I always feel like people are inviting you into your living room. This is a job. People know it's a job; it's a career, but everybody likes to have a little fun on the job. Everybody does. That's something I took from the newsroom to the anchor desk. I try not to be too flip or too obnoxious, but my philosophy is to watch the newscast with the viewer, and if things go wrong, or if I do something stupid, which happens all the time, comment about it. Say something about it. I get more e-mail about those kinds of remarks--about referencing video, the jokes at the end of the show--more comments on that from viewers than anything else."
A product of Jasper County in southeast Texas, Garsee grew up poor, in an area where personal growth was not exactly promoted.
"I didn't have much direction. I went to one of those schools where they didn't say the C word: college," Garsee said. "I was always very curious and knew at some point I had to get out of this little town. Everybody where I grew up ended up graduating from high school, getting married, working at the paper mill and dying. That's usually how life runs down there. I decided that's not for me. I was working as a bouncer at a nightclub, and my dad, who passed away last year, pulled me aside and said, 'Boy, you're going down a bad road. You might want to think about the military.' It's the only piece of advice he ever gave me, and the only piece of advice I ever took."
Garsee's stubborn nature played a major role in guiding his future toward the Navy. Instead of accepting what his recruiter pitched, Garsee pushed for a journalism position in the service, and had the wherewithal to wait nine months until an appropriate opening became available. During his three-year active-duty stint, Garsee was given the opportunity to pursue broadcasting--but the Texas twang had to go.
"They had a voice and diction course there. It was supposed to be one of the top voice and diction courses in the world, according to them," Garsee said. "They sent me through it twice."
In the private sector, Garsee took control of his fate as well. He was working in production as a master control operator at a television station in Beaumont, Texas; after considering the news product on the air, he felt he could do better. After the general manager got a hold of Garsee's audition tape, a transition to the newsroom followed.
Since Garsee's way seemed to be working, he wasn't about to change philosophies in his news delivery. Hence the humor. However, upon his arrival in Tucson, he had to coax Pickel to take the jump.
"One of the things humor does in a newscast is it brings out the personalities of the people around you," Garsee said. "Everybody thought Kris Pickel and I were a great team, but when she first started, she said, 'I don't want to laugh on the air.' I said, 'Why not?' 'I sound ridiculous when I laugh.' 'No you don't. Everyone sounds natural when they laugh.'
"Eventually, she loosened up, and once that happened, people started calling us a great team. They said, 'You guys act like you really like each other.' Well, we do like each other. Any time you can joke with someone, you obviously like them."
Now Tucson's top news team--which presided over the Best of TucsonTM Best Local Newscast--is no more. Pickel recently accepted an anchor position in Sacramento, Calif., and as a result, Garsee has been part of a musical-chairs anchor situation until KOLD finds a replacement. The candidates have been whittled down to three, and could be decided by mid-October.
"Personally, I think Kris and I took two or three years before we finally got to that point where we knew what the other was going to do. We even stopped consulting with each other at one point and just started playing off each other," Garsee said. "That kind of chemistry, if it isn't there early, then sometimes it can take a while to develop, so let's hope that whoever the new person is, (it) is somebody who enjoys the job, enjoys being on the air and enjoys bringing the personalities out of everyone around them."
Bandit '07
Oct 6th 2006, 09:42 AM
Smart-assed anchor ... meet thin-skinned news director.
I guess they'll get to find out if product trumps personality/familiarity.
[ October 06, 2006, 09:43 AM: Message edited by: Bandit '06 ]
Michigan J. Frog
Oct 6th 2006, 10:00 AM
Good to see that management isn't afraid to fire a popular anchor for doing something that would result in termination for any other employee.
Chief
Oct 6th 2006, 10:24 AM
Bad move on both parts.
He had no business undermining the news director.
She should have suspended him rather than remove him.
Could have been, should have been, handled behind closed doors between the two.
Bandit '07
Oct 6th 2006, 10:41 AM
Originally posted by Chief:
Bad move on both parts.
He had no business undermining the news director.
She should have suspended him rather than remove him.
Could have been, should have been, handled behind closed doors between the two.Agreed. Not defending what the guy did, but this was a real missed opportunity to show some leadership.
Another side
Oct 6th 2006, 01:43 PM
On a strictly behavioral basis, I'm with the GM -- you don't criticize your ND in an email to other employees and still keep your job. And, as GM, if you have to choose between a pissed off ND and a smug, insubordinate anchor, well, the anchor loses.
Beyond that, it's almost as if the anchor was testing his muscle ... and lost. Maybe he gained a little humility in the process.
Zero
Oct 6th 2006, 01:59 PM
Originally posted by Another side:
On a strictly behavioral basis, I'm with the GM -- you don't criticize your ND in an email to other employees and still keep your job. And, as GM, if you have to choose between a pissed off ND and a smug, insubordinate anchor, well, the anchor loses.
Beyond that, it's almost as if the anchor was testing his muscle ... and lost. Maybe he gained a little humility in the process.And maybe the station will lose revenue.
Sounds like the GM or ND don't care about how much money they lose, as long as they're getting even with an angry employee, who may very well have every reason in the world to be angry.
Dumb.
Roy Hobbs
Oct 6th 2006, 02:09 PM
Okay we've got hitting after the play ended, unsubstantiated finger pointing and a horse's ass anchor with offsetting compliance type ND and GM.
http://media.theinsiders.com/Media/NFL/182470_Referee-Jerry-Markbriet0128.JPG
Ball is returned to original line of scrimmage. Mgmt. resumes play without anchor who should have been given chance to apologize to staff, debacle in media for all concerned and bigmouth anchor resumes play from Grand Junction, Colo. or lower.
Tweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet!!!!!!!!!!!!
[ October 06, 2006, 02:11 PM: Message edited by: Roy Hobbs ]
Another side
Oct 6th 2006, 03:06 PM
Not bad, Hobbs ... Not bad.
Diplomat
Oct 6th 2006, 06:06 PM
Was she micromanaging?
If so, then what he said was true. It may have been inappropriate for him to put that in an email, though.
Micromanaging doesn't work.
adam & doctor drew
Oct 7th 2006, 12:01 AM
you can't call out your boss publicly and not expect consequences.... even if you're right.
Dcolton
Oct 7th 2006, 12:12 AM
Originally posted by Michigan J. Frog:
Good to see that management isn't afraid to fire a popular anchor for doing something that would result in termination for any other employee.Interestin point of view, froggy. I was wondering, does that same philosophy apply to the lives of US soldiers when liberals work to sabotage the war on terror?
Michigan J. Frog
Oct 7th 2006, 12:17 AM
You truly do have a warped sense of reality.
Dcolton
Oct 7th 2006, 12:59 AM
Originally posted by Michigan J. Frog:
You truly do have a warped sense of reality.How so. You apparantly support the idea of hierarchy to make a business run. How is that different when it comes to the US.
(I bet froggy doesn't answer)
Pro
Oct 7th 2006, 01:35 AM
Because this is a democracy. I'm sure that bothers you, but it's true.
Dcolton
Oct 7th 2006, 01:40 AM
Originally posted by Pro:
Because this is a democracy. I'm sure that bothers you, but it's true.So, can you democratically change the past?
Pro
Oct 7th 2006, 01:53 AM
What the hell are you talking about? I THOUGHT it was your usual bash against liberals and the war. My point is that they have every right to oppose this war and call for American troops to be redeployed, because this IS a democracy, and opposing views can be expressed and campaigned for.
Dcolton
Oct 7th 2006, 02:01 AM
Originally posted by Pro:
What the hell are you talking about? I THOUGHT it was your usual bash against liberals and the war. My point is that they have every right to oppose this war and call for American troops to be redeployed, because this IS a democracy, and opposing views can be expressed and campaigned for.But we are AT war and there is nothing that can be done about it short of sabotage. Just like the ND in this case IS the news director and there is nothing an anchor can do about it short of sabotage. Have you ever worked in a newsroom where one or two bitter people made it miserable?
Pro
Oct 7th 2006, 02:05 AM
But a newsroom is not a democracy. So it is an invalid comparison.
Dcolton
Oct 7th 2006, 02:09 AM
Originally posted by Pro:
But a newsroom is not a democracy. So it is an invalid comparison.And neither is the past. It is a valid comparison.
Pro
Oct 7th 2006, 02:12 AM
Where does "the past" come in?
Dcolton
Oct 7th 2006, 02:19 AM
Originally posted by Pro:
Where does "the past" come in?Huh?
Ferrycrossthemersey
Oct 7th 2006, 03:22 AM
Uh, meanwhile, can anybody in Tucson send the email?
a shooter
Oct 8th 2006, 04:44 PM
Originally posted by Paper Trail:
Germano said she couldn't confirm that Garsee's contract had been terminated because it was a personnel matter, but she did say he no longer works for KOLD. i point this out every time we see that someone gets fired - and i HATE it. they ALWAYS talk about the people when someone is HIRED...(a PERSONNEL matter) but when they are fired....nnnnooooOOOOOooooo. Germano shouldn't have been let off the hook so easily....
Michigan J. Frog
Oct 8th 2006, 08:06 PM
Originally posted by Dcolton:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Michigan J. Frog:
You truly do have a warped sense of reality.How so. You apparantly support the idea of hierarchy to make a business run. How is that different when it comes to the US.
(I bet froggy doesn't answer)</font>[/QUOTE]A privately-owned business is substantially different than a country run by an elected government, and if you need that difference explained to you, well, you have bigger problems than anyone here thought.
almostlive
Oct 8th 2006, 09:35 PM
Originally posted by a shooter:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Paper Trail:
Germano said she couldn't confirm that Garsee's contract had been terminated because it was a personnel matter, but she did say he no longer works for KOLD. i point this out every time we see that someone gets fired - and i HATE it. they ALWAYS talk about the people when someone is HIRED...(a PERSONNEL matter) but when they are fired....nnnnooooOOOOOooooo. Germano shouldn't have been let off the hook so easily....</font>[/QUOTE]Actually, there's RARELY talk about new hires, but it does happen occasionally with high-profile anchors. But exactly what is in that new hire talk? I'm not sure of any case where details of the contract are revealed even regarding new hires. It's usually just "such and so is joining the Action News Team as sports director. He comes to us from Capitol City, where he blah blah blah..." And when such and so leaves, that's what is announced, too (that he no longer works at the station). Details are verboten (sp?) on the front and back ends. They should remain private to the employer and employee. Terms of the hire are not the public's business and neither are terms of the departure.
Angel's Hell
Oct 9th 2006, 02:59 AM
Originally posted by Pro:
Because this is a democracy. I'm sure that bothers you, but it's true.As the US uses an electoral college to elect Presidents, we are really a Republic.
Or are you saying a newsroom is a democracy? I doubt that one!
Marty McFly
Oct 9th 2006, 03:09 AM
Originally posted by Pro:
My point is that they have every right to oppose this war and call for American troops to be redeployed, because this IS a democracy, and opposing views can be expressed and campaigned for.When did America become a Democracy?
Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. – James Bovard (1994) A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury. – Alexander Tytler The word democracy appears nowhere in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution -- two most fundamental documents of our nation. Instead of a democracy, the Constitution's Article IV, Section 4, guarantees "to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government." Moreover, let's ask ourselves: Does our pledge of allegiance to the flag say to "the democracy for which it stands," or does it say to "the republic for which it stands"? Or do we sing "The Battle Hymn of the Democracy" or "The Battle Hymn of the Republic"?- Walter Williams
SamG
Oct 9th 2006, 05:06 AM
Originally posted by Dcolton:
But we are AT war and there is nothing that can be done about it short of sabotage.What about appealing to our govenment to end this war? Or do our leaders not have the power to do that? How is that considered sabotage?
Conservative, of old.
Oct 9th 2006, 06:38 AM
Could someone please ban Dcolton... annoying hijacker of threads.
We get it... you don't like Democrats.
As a Conservative myself... I'm getting tired of your shtick... at least keep it in posts that ARE political.
Mr T
Oct 9th 2006, 07:25 AM
Originally posted by Conservative, of old.:
Could someone please ban Dcolton... annoying hijacker of threads.
We get it... you don't like Democrats.
As a Conservative myself... I'm getting tired of your shtick... at least keep it in posts that ARE political.I just wish we had a filter like they have on discussion groups via usenet so we wouldn't have to see the crap we don't like.
How the heck did this thread wind up about war & politics anyway?
+SN
Oct 9th 2006, 11:42 AM
Originally posted by Diplomat:
Was she micromanaging?
Micromanaging doesn't work.Micromanaging almost never works long term. And it usually leads to a (lower morale/higher turn over) for all workers involved.
+SN
News Is Broken
Oct 9th 2006, 11:45 AM
Originally posted by Marty McFly:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> The word democracy appears nowhere in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution -- two most fundamental documents of our nation. Instead of a democracy, the Constitution's Article IV, Section 4, guarantees "to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government." Moreover, let's ask ourselves: Does our pledge of allegiance to the flag say to "the democracy for which it stands," or does it say to "the republic for which it stands"? Or do we sing "The Battle Hymn of the Democracy" or "The Battle Hymn of the Republic"?- Walter Williams </font>[/QUOTE]I'm just waiting for Bush to put on a bathrobe and declare that the Republic is being reorganized into the first Galactic Empire....
chickensalad
Oct 18th 2006, 01:41 PM
So the guy was fired for his opinion or sending the email via work computer? So the firings will continue till morale inproves.... graemlins/face_banghead.gif
stpeterdontyacallme
Dec 18th 2006, 04:16 PM
For those who do not know the market. Mr. Garsee had it coming.
You can debate the issues of whether it was a bad move on his part or the ND's. But the fact is, he has had it coming for awhile.
If he's half as good as he THINKS he is( and he thinks his isht smells like roses), he'll land on his feet.
Don Konkey
Dec 18th 2006, 04:58 PM
What was the point in re-hashing this old thread?
Paper Trail
Dec 18th 2006, 06:42 PM
RandyGarsee.blogspot.com (http://randygarsee.blogspot.com/)
Garsee.blogspot.com (http://garsee.blogspot.com/)
Randy Garsee Anchoring & War Zone Reporting (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3978829912082434571&sourceid=docidfeed&hl=en)
A Randy Kind Of News Anchor (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8760449302312186333&hl=en)
Paper Trail
Dec 18th 2006, 09:20 PM
Garsee, a former KOLD anchor, returns to TV
By Erin White
Arizona Dail Star (http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/160597)
Former KOLD-TV Channel 13 anchor Randy Garsee returns to television at 9 Sunday night on the CW with a half-hour program on Tucson's art scene.
The show, "Randy Garsee Reports: The Art Dealer," will explain how to profit from art, as well as share some tips on how to make it.
Garsee plans to create a series of documentaries that will air regularly on the CW.
"There may only be one per month, but we will heavily publicize them when we have them. If and when he becomes able to increase the frequency of these, or when there is enough of a library, we hope to air them weekly," says Dominick San Angelo, a spokesman for the station.
San Angelo says Sunday at 9 p.m. could become the permanent home for the programs.
The first installation will focus on a Sacramento artist and Mark Sublette of Tucson's Medicine Man Gallery.
Garsee says his concept is to produce sponsored documentaries under the title "Randy Garsee Reports." With this format, segments will air at much longer lengths — nine minutes or more, an eternity in the television news universe.
The former anchor says he will seek stories he thinks are not usually told on more traditional news segments.
"People who cannot get on a news program with their concerns, advice or ideas can now find an outlet with me," he says.
Clubbeat
Dec 19th 2006, 08:29 AM
First..how (and why) did this digress from a thread about poor judgement from a popular anchor to talking about the war (which if you want to be technical folks, we're using miltary force...we have not delcared war on anybody since WWII).
Two points here. 1) Anchor using company e-mail to criticize his boss is wrong, plain and simple. Someone with his experience should have found other ways to express his opinion.
2) Management's reaction a little overboard. A suspension and public apology would've showed some effective leadership. Letting go of one of your key players because of a first time, not so major offense is a bit much, but then again, there might be more to the story than we all know. In any event it appears to be a knee-jerk reaction.
Sparky
Dec 19th 2006, 10:15 AM
There's a lesson to be learned in Mr. Garsee's actions. No matter how popular an anchor is with the public and no matter how secure he feels because of that popularity, don't ever put corporate in a position where they have to choose sides between you and someone in management. You'll always lose. It's how corporations are set up. It's business. If you don't have the title of "Manager" in front of your name, you lose. Always.
(not defending what Garsee did)