PDA

View Full Version : Sinclair, fired worker settle


Paper Trail
Dec 18th 2006, 05:59 AM
Suits are ended over his ouster
By Nick Madigan
Sun reporter (http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-bz.leiberman16dec16,0,4488733.story?coll=bal-business-headlines)

Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc., the Hunt Valley television station owner, and its former Washington bureau chief have decided to end a two-year legal battle over his dismissal during the 2004 presidential election campaign.

Sinclair fired Jonathan S. Leiberman in October 2004 after he publicly criticized Sinclair's decision to pre-empt normal programming at 40 of the company's stations to air what he called "an extremely one-sided and negative" documentary about Democratic nominee John Kerry.

Sinclair later sued Leiberman, saying he divulged confidential information about the company in an interview with The Sun, during which the bureau chief called the documentary "biased political propaganda."

In a countersuit, filed in Baltimore County Circuit Court, Leiberman said the TV company's decision to fire him was "retaliation, pure and simple, for his public stand that Sinclair's plans were inconsistent with journalistic ethics."

Leiberman, now a correspondent at America's Most Wanted, said he had been wrongfully discharged and sought $79,166, the amount he would have earned had he served out his two-year contract, plus an unspecified amount in unpaid benefits. Sinclair sought $17,000, representing a percentage of Lieberman's salary had he worked until his contract expired.

Both sides dropped their suits this week. Under the terms of the settlement, no one involved in the case may speak publicly about it.

Sinclair had prevailed in an earlier case before the Maryland Department of Labor, which found that Leiberman had violated provisions of his contract that prohibited speaking to the press without permission about internal company matters.

The Mockingbird
Dec 18th 2006, 10:59 AM
Good for him.

Jon's a nice guy, and he always did a good job. It's too bad he had to work for a tool of a company.

Chief
Dec 18th 2006, 12:50 PM
I hope he got Sinclair to pay for the legal fees and recieved his full contracted pay. But I guess we'll never know.

Brain Cramp
Dec 18th 2006, 12:54 PM
Originally posted by Chief:
I hope he got Sinclair to pay for the legal fees and recieved his full contracted pay. But I guess we'll never know.... and I hope he gets paid a lot more money at "America's Most Wanted" and I hope that Sinclair is fined beaucoup bucks by the FCC for trying to pass off propoganda as containing some kind of news content. Oh, and I also hope I get a pony.

Consider This
Dec 18th 2006, 01:02 PM
Originally posted by Chief:
I hope he got Sinclair to pay for the legal fees and recieved his full contracted pay. But I guess we'll never know.If he had a typical Sinclair contract, it explicity stated that should the company sue him that he would get to pay the company's legal fees.

That turned me away from signing with a Sinclair outfit.

Don Konkey
Dec 21st 2006, 07:15 PM
A good friend of mine's father had a bad go-round with Sinclair. After seeing his ordeal, I decided I would never go near a Sinclair property.

Roy Hobbs
Dec 21st 2006, 10:48 PM
Originally posted by Peter Gibbons:
A good friend of mine's father had a bad go-round with Sinclair.My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend saw Ferris pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious.

The Thrill
Dec 22nd 2006, 08:05 AM
Originally posted by Roy Hobbs:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Peter Gibbons:
A good friend of mine's father had a bad go-round with Sinclair.My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend saw Ferris pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious.</font>[/QUOTE]Thank you, Simone.

http://www.80s.com/saveferris/images/class/teacher1.jpg

[ December 22, 2006, 09:06 AM: Message edited by: The Thrill ]

facts
Jan 4th 2007, 04:43 AM
Anyone else struck by the $79,166 for the remainder of two years line?

That means to be the Washington bureau cheif for many TV stations doing hits all day long in the nation's capital pays LESS than that PER YEAR?

Yikes.

The Mockingbird
Jan 4th 2007, 04:46 AM
No, because we don't know how much he had left on his contract. Hang on, lemme do some math. Be right back!

Roy Hobbs
Jan 4th 2007, 06:09 AM
Originally posted by Chief:
I hope he got Sinclair to pay for the legal fees and recieved his full contracted pay. But I guess we'll never know.Generally the lawyers on both sides make sure they make money...the person bringing the suit usually gets screwed methinks.

facts
Jan 5th 2007, 04:54 AM
Originally posted by The Mockingbird:
No, because we don't know how much he had left on his contract. Hang on, lemme do some math. Be right back!Well, whatever math we do, we know that he was paid less than $79,000 per year, because the $79,000 was for one year plus the remainder of the second. We don't know how long the remainder was, but we're left with a yearly number less than $79,000. Good pay in general, perhaps, but for that job?

The Mockingbird
Jan 5th 2007, 04:58 AM
Isn't around 70k what junior network correspondants are making? I honestly don't remember the pay scale.